Polypeptides capable of forming antigen binding structures with specificity for the Rhesus D antigens, the DNA encoding them and the process for their preparation and use

ABSTRACT

Polypeptides capable of forming antigen binding structures specific for Rhesus D antigens include the sequences indicated in the FIGS.  1   a  to  16   b . The obtained polypeptides, being Fab fragments, MAY be used directly as an active ingredient in pharmaceutical and diagnostic compositions. The Fab and their DNA sequences can also be used for the preparation of complete recombinant Anti-Rhesus D antibodies. Useful in pharmaceutical and diagnostic compositions.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.09/147,443, filed Jan. 21, 1999, incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety, which is a National Stage of PCT/EP97/03253, filed Jun. 20,1997, which claims priority to EPO 96810421.6, filed Jun. 24, 1996. Theabove applications are incorporated herein by reference in theirentirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to polypeptides forming antigen bindingstructures with specificity for Rhesus D antigens and especially to Fabmolecules with specificity for the Rhesus D antigen. The invention alsorelates to their application to provide pharmacological and diagnosticcompositions. The above Fab fragments when genetically engineered to bepart of complete antibodies are useful for the prophylaxis of hemolyticdisease of the newborn (HDN). This invention provides the novel DNA andamino acid sequences of the above polypeptides.

Thus, the antibodies can be used for the protection of Rhesus negativewomen before or immediately after the birth of a Rhesus positive childto prevent HDN in subsequent pregnancies.

The invention also includes the application of the said Fab moleculeseither alone or in combination with Fc constant regions as completeantibodies for the purposes of treating other illnesses which mightbenefit from anti-Rhesus D immunoglobulin e.g. treatment of idiopathicthrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).

In addition anti-Rhesus D immunoglobulin can be used aftermistransfusions of Rhesus positive blood to Rhesus negative recipientsin order to prevent sensitization to the Rhesus D antigen. Further theinvention relates to the application of these Fab fragments andantibodies as diagnostic reagents.

HDN is the general designation for hemolytic anemia of fetuses andnewborn babies caused by antibodies of the mother. These antibodies aredirected against antigens on the surface of the fetal erythrocytes.These antigens can belong to the Rhesus, ABO or other blood groupsystems.

The Rhesus blood group system includes 5 major antigens: D, C, c, E ande (Issitt, P. D., Med. Lab. Sci. 45:395, 1988). The D antigen is themost important of these antigens as it is highly immunogenic elicitinganti-Rhesus D antibodies during Rhesus incompatible pregnancies andfollowing transfusion of Rhesus incompatible blood. The D antigen isfound in approximately 85% of Caucasians in Europe and those individualsare said to be Rhesus positive, Individuals lacking the D antigen arecalled Rhesus negative. The expression of the D antigen can vary due toeither low antigen density, hereafter known as weak D or D^(u), or dueto partial antigenicity, hereafter known as partial D antigens.

The Rhesus D antigen, a membrane protein of the erythrocyte, hasrecently been cloned and its primary structure described (Le Van Kim,C., et al., PNAS 89:10925, 1992). Modeling studies suggest that theRhesus D antigen has 12 transmembrane domains with only very shortconnecting regions extending outside the cell membrane or protrudinginto the cytoplasm.

The partial D phenotypes were first identified in people who carried Dantigen on their red cells but who had an alloanti-D in their sera(Rose, R. R. and Sanger, R., Blood groups in man, Blackwell Scientific,Oxford, U.K. 1975; Tippett, P. et al., Vox Sanguinis. 70:123, 1996).This can be explained by regarding the D antigen as a mosaic structurewith at least 9 different epitopes (epD1 to epD9). Thus in some Dvariant people the red cells lack part of this mosaic and antibodies aremade to the missing D epitopes. Rhesus positive individuals that makeantibodies against partial D antigens have been classified into six maindifferent categories (D^(II) to D^(VII)) each having a differentabnormality in the D antigen. More recently it has been shown that theseD categories gave different patterns of reaction when tested againstpanels of human monoclonal anti-D antibodies (Tippett, P., et al., VoxSanguinis. 70:123, 1996). The different reaction patterns identified the9 epitopes and so define the different partial D categories. The numberof epitopes present on the D antigen varies from one partial D categoryto another with the D^(VI) category expressing the least, epD3, 4 and 9.The D^(VI) category is clinically important as a D^(VI) woman can beimmunized strongly enough to cause hemolytic disease of the newborn.

The prophylactic efficacy of anti-RhD IgG for prevention of hemolyticdisease of the newborn is well established and has been in routine usefor many years. As a result this severe disease has become a rarity.Nevertheless the underlying cause of the disease, i.e. RhDincompatibility between a RhD negative mother carrying a RhD positivechild still remains and thus requires a continual supply of therapeuticanti-RhD IgG.

In recent years the assurance of a continual supply of anti-RhD IgG hasbecome an increasing problem. The pool of available hyperimmune serumfrom alloimmunized multiparous Rhesus negative women has drasticallydecreased due to the success of prophylactic anti-RhD. Thus the currentmethods of production require repeated immunization of an increasinglyreluctant pool of donors for the production of high titer antiserum(Selinger, M., Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 98:509, 1991). There are alsoassociated risk factors and technical problems such as the use of Rhesuspositive red blood cells for repeated immunization carrying the risk oftransmission of viral diseases like hepatitis B, AIDS and other as yetunknown viruses (Hughes-Jones, N. C., Br. J. Haematol. 70:263, 1988).Therefore an alternative method for production of anti-RhD antibodies isrequired.

In the past few years various alternative sources of hyperimmune serumhave been tried but all are associated with disadvantages. Epstein BarrVirus (EBV) transformation of lymphocytes creating B lymphoblastoid celllines that secrete specific antibody including against the Rhesus Dantigen (Crawford et al., Lancet. 386: Feb. 19th, 1983) are unstable andrequire extensive cloning. Also due to the low transformationefficiencies (1-3% of B cells) only a restricted range of antibodyspecificities can be obtained from the potential repertoire.Additionally it seems that mice do not respond to the Rhesus D antigenand thus no murine monoclonal antibodies are available which could beused for producing chimaeric or humanised antibodies. Until recently theonly other alternative was production of human antibodies by thehybridoma technique which was also restricted by the lack of a suitablehuman myeloma cell fusion partner (Kozbor, D. and Roder, J. C., Immunol.Today. 4:72, 1983).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is thus the object of the present invention to provide Fab fragmentshaving a reactivity against the Rhesus D antigen as well as completeantibodies comprising the Fab fragments which are free from the abovementioned drawbacks.

In the last few years the technique of repertoire cloning and theconstruction of phage display libraries has opened up new possibilitiesto produce human antibodies of defined specificity (Williamson, R. A. etal., PNAS 90:4141, 1993). These methods were thus applied to thepreparation of polypeptides capable of forming antigen bindingstructures with specificity for Rhesus D antigens, especially of Fabfragments having an activity against Rhesus D and partial D antigens.

The generation of human antibodies by repertoire cloning as described inrecent years (Barbas III, C. F. and Lerner, R. A., Companion MethodsEnzymol. 2:119, 1991) is based on isolating mRNA from peripheral Bcells. This method offers the tools to isolate natural antibodies,autoantibodies or antibodies generated during the course of an immuneresponse (Zebedee, S. L., et al., PNAS 89:3175, 1992; Vogel, M. et al.,Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1200, 1994). This method relies on constructing arecombinant antibody library from a particular donor starting from themRNA coding for immunoglobulin (Ig) molecules. As only the peripheralblood lymphocytes (PBL) can be isolated from a donor the chances offinding specific antibody producing B cells in the periphery areincreased if an individual is boosted with the desired antigen shortlybefore harvesting the PBL (Persson, M. A. A., et al., PNAS 88:2432,1991). The total RNA is then isolated and the mRNA of the Ig repertoirecan be cloned using Ig specific primers in the polymerase chain reaction(PCR) followed by the co-expression of heavy and light chains of the Igmolecule on the surface of a filamentous phage particle thereby formingan “organism” that in analogy to a B cell can bind to an antigen. In theliterature this method is also known as the combinatorial approach as itallows the independent combining of heavy and light chains to form afunctional Fab antibody fragment attached to one of the tail proteins,called pIII, of a filamentous phage. Phages carrying the Fab molecules(hereafter known as Phab particles) are selected for the desired antigenspecificity, by a process known as bio-panning. The antigen can beapplied to a solid support, specific Phab bind to the antigen whilst nonspecific Phab are washed away and finally the specific Phab are elutedfrom the solid support. The specific Phab are then amplified inbacteria, allowed to re-bind to the antigen on the solid support and thewhole process of bio-panning is repeated.

The successive rounds of panning and amplification of selected Phab inbacteria result in an enrichment of specific Phab that can be seen froma rise in titer of colony forming units (cfu) plated out after eachround of panning. Our previous experience and published data indicatethat specific phage can usually be detected after 4 to 6 panning rounds(Vogel, M. et al., Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1200, 1994). In the above citedrelated art there is, however, no hint that the indicated steps can beused for a successful preparation of Fab fragments of anti-Rh Dantibodies.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 a is an LD1-40-VH sequence;

FIG. 1 b is an LD1-40-VL sequence;

FIG. 2 a is an LD1-52-VH sequence;

FIG. 2 b is an LD1-52-VL sequence;

FIG. 3 a is an LD1-84-VH sequence;

FIG. 3 b is an LD1-84-VL sequence;

FIG. 4 a is an LD1-110-VH sequence;

FIG. 4 b is an LD1-110-VL sequence;

FIG. 5 a is an LD1-117-VH sequence;

FIG. 5 b is an LD1-117-VL sequence;

FIG. 6 a is an LD2-1-VH sequence;

FIG. 6 b is an LD2-1-VL sequence;

FIG. 7 a is an LD2-4-VH sequence;

FIG. 7 b is an LD2-4-VL sequence;

FIG. 8 a is an LD2-5-VH sequence;

FIG. 8 b is an LD2-5-VL sequence;

FIG. 9 a is an LD2-10-VH sequence;

FIG. 9 b is an LD2-10-VL sequence;

FIG. 10 a is an LD2-11-VH sequence;

FIG. 10 b is an LD2-11-VL sequence;

FIG. 11 a is an LD2-14-VH sequence;

FIG. 11 b is an LD2-14-VL sequence;

FIG. 12 a is an LD2-17-VH sequence;

FIG. 12 b is an LD2-17-VL sequence;

FIG. 13 a is an LD2-20-VH sequence;

FIG. 13 b is an LD2-20-VL sequence;

FIG. 14 a is an LD1-6-17-VH sequence;

FIG. 14 b is an LD1-6-17-VL sequence;

FIG. 15 a is an LD1/2-6-3-VH sequence;

FIG. 15 b is an LD1/2-6-3-VL sequence;

FIG. 16 a is an LD1/2-6-33-VH sequence;

FIG. 16 b is an LD1/2-6-33-VL sequence;

FIG. 17 shows the pComb3 expresion system;

FIG. 18 shows the preparation of genes of the heavy chains of thecomplete antibody; and

FIG. 19 shows the preparation fo genes of the light chains of thecomplete antibody.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the appended FIGS. 1 a to 16 b; DNA sequences coding for variableregions (V regions) of anti Rh D Fab fragments and the correspondingpolypeptide sequences are disclosed.

FIG. 17 shows the pComb3 expression system used according to the presentinvention.

FIGS. 18 and 19 show the separate preparation of genes of the heavy andlight chains of the complete antibody according to the description inexample 6.

Subjects of the present invention are polypeptides capable of formingantigen binding structures with specificity for Rhesus D antigensaccording to the definition of claim 1. The table in claim 1 refers tothe appended figures. The identification number for each sequence isgiven. The locations of the Rhesus D specific CDR1 (complementaritydetermining region 1), CDR2 and CDR3 regions are indicated in thefigures and according to base pair number in the table of claim 1.Preferred polypeptides according to the invention are anti-Rhesus Dantibodies which include the variable regions of the heavy and lightchains according to the sequences given in FIGS. 1 a-16 b. The FIGS. 1a, 2 a, . . . 16 a are related to the variable regions of the heavychain and the FIGS. 1 b, 2 b, . . . 16 b are related to the variableregions of the light chain.

Further subjects of the present invention are the DNA sequences codingfor antigen binding polypeptides according to the definition of claim 6.Preferred DNA sequences are those coding for variable regions of Fabfragments of anti-Rh D antibodies according to the FIGS. 1 a-16 b. TheFIGS. 1 a, 2 a, . . . 16 a are related to the heavy chain and the FIGS.1 b, 2 b, . . . 16 b are related to the light chain.

A further subject of the present invention is a process for preparingrecombinant Fab polypeptides according to the definition in claim 11.

A further subject of the present invention is a process for theselection of recombinant polypeptides according to claim 12.

Further subjects of the present invention are anti-Rh D antibodiesaccording to the definition of claim 14, preferably anti-Rh Dimmunoglobulin molecules comprising the heavy and light chain variableregions according to the FIGS. 1 a to 16 b combined with known heavy andlight chain constant regions.

Further subjects of the present invention are pharmaceutical anddiagnostic compositions comprising polypeptides, anti-Rh D antibodies orFab fragments according to the invention.

The total re-amplified Phab population obtained after each panning canbe tested for specificity using various methods such as ELISA andimmunodot assays. It is also defined by the nature of the antigen e.g.anti-Rhesus D Phabs are detected by indirect haemagglutination using arabbit anti-phage antibody or equivalent Coombs reagent as the crosslinking antibody. Once a total Phab population has been identified aspositive for the desired antigen, individual Phab clones are isolatedand the DNA coding for the desired Fab molecules is sequenced.Individual Fab can then be produced by use of the pComb3 expressionsystem which is illustrated in FIG. 16. In this system the gIII gene,coding for the tail protein pIII, is cut out from the phagemid vectorpComb3. This allows production of soluble Fab in the bacterialperiplasm. Such individual Fab fragments can then be tested for antigenspecificity.

The phage display approach has also been used as a means of rescuingmonoclonal antibodies from unstable hybridoma cell lines. This has beenreported for anti-Rhesus D antibodies (Siegel, D. L. and Silberstein, L.E., Blood. 83:2334, 1994; Dziegiel, M. et al., J. Immunol. Methods.182:7, 1995). A phage display library constructed from non-immunizeddonors has also been used to select Fv fragments (i.e. variable regionsof heavy and light chains, V_(H) and V_(L)) specific for human bloodgroup antigens which included one Fv fragment reacting against theRhesus D antigen (Marks, J. D. et al., Biotechnology. 11:1145, 1993).

Important considerations when constructing combinatorial libraries arethe source of cells used for RNA extraction and the nature of theantigen used for panning. Therefore, this invention uses a hyperimmunedonor who was boosted i.v. with Rhesus D⁺ red blood cells (rbc). The PBLof the donor were harvested at +5 and +18 days after the i.v. boost andwere used to construct 2 combinatorial libraries hereafter known aslibrary D1 (LD1) and library D2 (LD2) respectively. Doubleimmunofluorescence analysis of the harvested PBL, using the markers CD20and CD38 for pan B cells and lymphoblastoid cells respectively, showed ahigher than normal percentage of lymphoblastoid B cells, of plasma cellmorphology. The high number of plasma cells found in the peripheralblood is most unusual as normally there are less than 1% in theperiphery and probably indicates that the donor had a high percentage ofcirculating B cells with specificity for the Rhesus D antigen.

After construction of the library, the selection of Phabs specific forthe Rhesus D antigen was achieved by bio-panning on fresh whole rbc ofphenotype R1R1 (CDe/CDe) i.e. the reference cells used for Rhesus Dtyping. This was necessary since the Rhesus D antigen, an integralmembrane protein of 417 amino acids (Le Van Kim, C. et al, PNAS89:10925, 1992), loses its immunogenicity during purification (Paradis,G. et al, J. Immunol. 137:240, 1986) and therefore a chemically purifiedD antigen cannot be bound to a solid phase for selection ofimmunoreactive Phabs as for other antigen specificities previouslyselected in this system (Vogel, M. et al., Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1200,1994). Modeling studies have suggested that only very short connectingregions of the Rhesus D antigen extend outside the cell membrane orprotrude into the cytoplasm (Chérif-Zahar, B. et al, PNAS 87:6243,1990). Thus the parts of the RhD antigen visible to antibodies arerelatively restricted and may be under conformational constraint. Thisaspect of the Rhesus D antigen becomes even more important whenconsidering selection of Phabs with reactivity against the partial Dphenotypes which essentially lack certain defined epitopes of the Dmembrane protein (Mouro, I. et al, Blood. 83:1129, 1994).

Furthermore, since whole rbc do not only express the D antigen, a seriesof negative absorptions had to be performed on Rhesus D negative rbc inorder to absorb out those Phabs reacting with the other antigenicproteins found on the rbc.

This panning procedure performed on Phabs coming from both LD1 and LD2libraries resulted in the isolation of 6 different Fab producing clonesfrom library LD1, 8 different Fab producing clones from library LD2 and2 Fab producing clones from the pooled libraries LD1 and LD2.

The nomenclature and the figures where the sequences are listed aregiven in table 1. TABLE 1 LIBRARY V_(H)- V_(L)- LIBRARY V_(H)- V_(L)-LD1 Sequence Sequence LD2 Sequence Sequence Clone No. Figure FigureClone No. Figure Figure LD1-40 1a 1b LD2-1  6a  6b LD1-52 2a 2b LD2-4 7a  7b LD1-84 3a 3b LD2-5  8a  8b LD1-110 4a 4b LD2-10  9a  9b LD1-1175a 5b LD2-11 10a 10b LD2-14 11a 11b LD2-17 12a 12b LD2-20 13a 13b

The above Fab clones show exclusive reactivity against the Rhesus Dantigen, 3 of 5 D^(u) rbc tested and agglutinating reactivity againstthe Partial D phenotypes as follows: Rh33, DIII, DIVa, DIVb, DVa, DVII.

However, using the above mentioned R1R1 rbc for panning of the Phabs, noclones were isolated which reacted against the Partial DVI phenotype. Asthe serum of the original hyperimmune donor tested at the time ofconstruction of the recombinant library, was known to react against theDVI phenotype the recombinant library should also contain the anti-DVIspecificity.

In order to select for the DVI reactivity the panning conditions werechanged in that different cells were used. A special donor whose rbc hadbeen typed and were known to express the Partial DVI phenotype was usedas the source of cells for re-panning the LD1 and LD2 libraries. Thissecond series of pannings was essentially performed in the same way asthe first series except for the substitution of DVI rbc for R1R1 rbc andthe addition of bromelase treatment to the DVI rbc. The DVI phenotypeexpresses the least number of Rhesus D epitopes and it is thereforedifficult to make antibodies against it. It has been reported that only15% of unselected polyclonal anti-D and 35% of selected anti-D made byRhesus D negative subjects reacted with DVI+ cells (Mouro, I. et al,Blood. 83:1129, 1994). Bromelase treatment which removesN-acetylneuraminic acid (sialic acid) from the rbc membrane, wasperformed in order to render the Rhesus DVI epitopes more accessibleduring the panning with the pre-absorbed Phabs.

This second series of pannings on the LD1 library resulted in 1 Fabproducing clone LD1-6-17. The nomenclature is given in table 2. TABLE 2V_(H)-Sequence V_(L)-Sequence LIBRARY LD1 figure figure Clone No:LD1-6-17 14a 14b

However this clone was reacting with Rhesus alleles C and E and showinga false positive reaction with DVI positive rbc. This was also due tothe phenotype of the DVI donor (Cc DVI ee) who expressed the C allelewhich was not absorbed out by the Rhesus negative rbc (ccddee).

Thus a third series of pannings on a pool of the LD1 and LD2 librarieswas performed using different rbc for the absorption phase. After 6rounds of panning using both bromelase treated and non treated rbc forboth the absorption steps and the elution from DVI positive rbc a totalpopulation of Phabs was obtained which reacted exclusively with rbc ofphenotype R1R1 (CCDDee) and 2 different donors expressing the DVIvariant.

This third series of pannings on the LD 1 and LD2 libraries resulted in2 Fab producing clones reacting with DVI+ rbc. The nomenclature is givenin table 3. TABLE 3 V_(H)-Sequence V_(L)-Sequence LIBRARY LD1/LD2 figurefigure Clone No: LD1/2-6-3 15a 15b Clone No: LD1/2-6-33 16a 16b

Thus a total of 16 different anti-Rhesus D Fab clones have beenisolated. The DNA from these clones has been isolated and sequencedusing Fluorescent Cycle Sequencing on an ABI 373A Sequencing System. Thenucleotide and corresponding amino acid sequences of the said Fab clonesform the basis of this invention.

Sequence analysis has revealed that several clones were isolated bearingthe same V_(H) gene segment but different V_(L) gene segments. This isthe case for the two clones LD2-1 and LD2-10, for the two clones LD2-4and LD2-11, and for the three clones LD2-14, LD1/2-6-3 and LD1/2-6-33,respectively.

The DNA sequences obtained and Fab fragments are useful for thepreparation of complete antibodies having an activity against the RhesusD antigen. Suitable expression systems for such antibodies are mousemyeloma cells or Chinese hamster ovary cells.

The examples which follow explain the invention in detail, without anyrestriction of the scope of the invention.

Example 1 describes the construction of 2 combinatorial libraries;especially the aforementioned LD1 and LD2 libraries.

Example 2 describes a series of pannings using R1R1 rbc on the said LD1and LD2 libraries in detail.

Example 3 describes a series of pannings using both bromelase and nonbromelase treated rbc for absorption and bromelase treated DVI positiverbc using a pool of the said LD1 and LD2 libraries.

Example 4 describes an indirect haemagglutination assay using a rabbitanti-phage antibody, as an equivalent Coombs reagent, to monitor theenrichment and specificity of Rhesus D specific Phabs after panning.

Example 5 describes the preparation and purification of Fab antibodyfragments for application as diagnostic reagents.

Example 6 describes the preparation of complete anti-Rhesus Dimmunoglobulins using the sequences of the present invention.

EXAMPLE 1 Construction of the Recombinant LD1 and LD2 Libraries

a) Source of the Lymphocytes

A male adult who was a member of the volunteer pool of hyperimmuneRhesus D donors was given an i.v. boost of 2 ml of packed rbc from aknown male donor of blood group O RhD⁺. The PBL were harvested at +5 and+18 days after the boost and the mononuclear cells (MNC) isolated byFicoll gradient centrifugation (Lymphoprep, Pharmacia, Milwaukee, Wis.).The results of donor lymphocyte analysis of day +5 are given in table 4.The +5 day MNC were used directly for RNA preparation using aphenol-chloroform guanidinium isothiocyanate procedure (Chomczynski, P.and Sacchi, N., Anal. Biochem. 162:156, 1987). The +18 day MNC werefirst cultured for 3 days in RPMI-1640 medium (Seromed, Basel)containing 10³ U/ml of IL-2 (Sandoz Research Center, Vienna, Austria)and 10 μg/ml of pokeweed mitogen (PWM; Sigma L9379, Buchs, Switzerland)before extracting RNA. TABLE 4 Immunofluorescence analysis of donorlymphocytes + 5 days after rbc i.v. boost Cell Cell surface % Positivesurface % Positive antigen cells antigen cells CD20 15 CD8 12 CD38 20CD25 7.6 CD20/38 15 CD57 12.5 CD3 47 CD14 6 CD4 34 HLA-DR 18

b) Construction of Library

Two separate libraries were constructed called LD 1 and LD2 (as detailedabove) corresponding to the cells harvested at +5 days and +18 days(finally +21 days including the +3 days PWM stimulation) after the i.v.boost respectively. Total RNA was then prepared from these cells using aphenol-chloroform guanidinium isothiocyanate method. From this RNA, 10μg were used to make cDNA using an oligo(dT) primer (400 ng) and reversetranscribed with M-MuLV reverse transcriptase according to theconditions specified by the supplier (Boehringer Mannheim Germany). PCRamplification was performed as described in Vogel, M. et al., E. J. ofImmunol. 24:1200, 1994. Briefly, 100 μl PCR reaction containedPerkin-Elmer buffer with 10 mM MgCl₂, 5 μl cDNA, 150 ng of eachappropriate 5′ and 3′ primer, all four dNTP at 200 μM each and 2 U/mlTaq Polymerase (Perkin Elmer, NJ). The PCR amplification of the heavyand light chains of the Fab molecule was performed separately with a setof primers from Stratacyte (details given below). For the heavy chainsix upstream primers were used that hybridize to each of the sixfamilies of the V_(H) genes whereas one kappa and one lambda chainprimer were used for the light chain. The downstream primers weredesigned to match the hinge region of the constant domains γ1 and γ3 forthe heavy chain. For the light chain the downstream primers were matchedto the 3′ end of kappa and lambda constant domains. The heavy and lightchain PCR products were pooled separately, gel purified and cut withXho1/Spe1 and Sac1/Xba1 restriction enzymes (Boehringer Mannheim),respectively. After digestion the PCR products were extracted once withphenol:chloroform:isoamylalcohol and purified by gel excision. Theinsertion of the Xho1/Spe1 digested Fd fragment and subsequent ligationof the Sac1/Xba1 digested light chain into the pComb3 vector, thetransformation into XL1-Blue cells, and the production of phages wereperformed as described by (Barbas III, C. F. and Lerner, R. A.,Companion Methods Enzymol. 2:119, 1991).

After transformation of the XL1-Blue E. coli cells samples werewithdrawn and titrated on plates to determine the library size. Theseresults indicated expression libraries of 7.5×10⁶ and 7.7×10⁶ cfu(colony forming units) for LD1 and LD2 respectively.

c) PCR Primers VHI 5′-CAC TCC CAG GTG CAG CTG CTC GAG (SEQ ID NO:65) TCTGG-3′ VHII 5′-GTG CTG TCC CAG GTC AAC TTA CTC (SEQ ID NO:66) GAG TCTGG-3′ VHIII 5′-GTC CAG GTG GAG GTG CAG CTG CTC (SEQ ID NO:67) GAG TCTGG-3′ VHIV 5′-GTC CTG TCC CAG GTG CAG CTG CTC (SEQ ID NO:68) GAG TCGGG-3′ VHV 5′-GTC TGT GCC GAG GTG CAG CTG CTC (SEQ ID NO:69) GAG TCTGG-3′ VHVI 5′-GTC CTG TCA CAG GTA CAG CTG CTC (SEQ ID NO:70) GAG TCAGG-3′ CHI(gI) 5′-AGC ATC ACT AGT ACA AGA TTT GGG (SEQ ID NO:71) GTC-3′VL(k) 5′-GT GCG AGA TGT GAG CTC GTG ATG (SEQ ID NO:72) ACC CAG TCTCCA-3′ CL(k) 5′-T CCT TCT AGA TTA CTA ACA CTC TCC (SEQ ID NO:73) CCT GTTGAA GCT CTT TGT GAC GGG CGA ACT C-3′ VL(l) 5′ G TGC ACA GGG TCC TGG GCCGAG CTC (SEQ ID NO:74) GTG GTG ACT CA-3′ CL(I) 5′ G CAT TCT AGA CTA TTATGA ACA TTC (SEQ ID NO:75) TGT AGG GGG-3′

d) Vectors and Bacterial Strains

The pComb3 vector used for cloning of the Fd and the light chain wasobtained from the Scripps Research institute La Jolla, Calif.; (BarbasIII, G. E. and Lerner, R. A., Companion Methods Enzymol. 2:119, 1991).The Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue used for transformation of thepComb3 vector and the VCSM13 helper phage were purchased from Stratacyte(La Jolla, Calif.).

EXAMPLE 2 Selection of Rhesus D Phabs from LD1 and LD2 Libraries on R1R1rbc

a) Absorption and B jo-Panning

A series of three negative absorptions on rbc group O Rh negative wereperformed for each panning round before positive selection on rbc groupO Rh positive (R1R1). Fresh rbc were collected in ACD (acid citratedextrose) anticoagulant and washed 3 times in 0.9% NaCl. The rbc werecounted in Hayems solution and adjusted to 40×10⁶/ml. Absorption: 1 mlof phage preparation in PBS/3% BSA was added to rbc group O Rh negativepellet (16×10⁶ rbc) in 12 ml tubes (Greiner 187261, Reinach,Switzerland) and incubated at RT for 30 min. with careful shaking. Alltubes were pre-blocked in PBS/3% BSA for a minimum of 1 hr at RT. Therbc were pelleted by centrifuging for 5 min. 300×g at 4° C. Theresulting phage supernatant was carefully harvested and the processrepeated twice more. After the final absorption the phage supernatantwas added to the rbc group O Rh positive pellet (16×10⁶ rbc) and againincubated at RT for 30 min. with gentle shaking. Then the rbc werewashed at least 5 times in 10 ml ice cold PBS, centrifuged 5 min. 300×gat 4° C., followed by elution with 200 μl of 76 mM citric acid pH 2.8for 6 min. at R.T. and neutralisation with 200 μl 1M Tris. The rbc werecentrifuged 300×g, 5 min. at 4° C. and the resulting supernatantcontaining the eluted phages was carefully removed and stored withcarrier protein (0.3% BSA) at 4° C. ready for re-amplification. Thenumbers of Rhesus D specific Phabs of each panning round are given intable 5. TABLE 5 Selection of Rhesus D+ Phabs from the LD1 and LD2libraries on R1R1 rbc No. of eluted Rhesus D specific phages PanningLibrary D1 Library D2 Round No. a) cfu cfu 1 8 × 10⁶ 4.6 × 10⁷ 2 6 × 10⁷1.4 × 10⁷ 3 1 × 10⁸ 7.9 × 10⁷ 4 3 × 10⁸ 1.3 × 10⁸ 5 3 × 10⁸   1 × 10⁸ 6nd 2.8 × 10⁸a) For each round 10¹² Phabs were incubated in tubes with rbc Group ORhesus negative (absorption phase) followed by elution from rbc Group ORhesus positive (R1R1)nd = not donecfu = colony forming units

EXAMPLE 3 Selection of Rhesus D Phabs from the Pooled LD1 and LD2Libraries on DVI+ rbc

a) Absorption on rbc Group O Rh Negative, Phenotypes 1 (r′r, Ccddee) and2 (ryry, CCddEE)

A series of four negative absorptions on rbc group O Rh negative wasperformed for each panning round before positive selection on rbc groupO Rh DVI positive. The negative absorptions were performed in thefollowing order: Step 1) phenotype 1 treated with bromelase; step 2)phenotype 1 no bromelase; step 3) phenotype 2 treated with bromelase;step 4) phenotype 2 no bromelase. Frozen rbc were thawed into a mixtureof sorbit and phosphate buffered saline, left standing in this solutionfor a minimum of 10 min. and then washed 5 to 6 times in phosphatebuffered saline and finally stored in stabilising solution (DiaMedEC-Solution) ready for use. Before panning the rbc were washed 3 timesin 0.9% NaCl. followed by counting in Hayems solution. Absorption: 1 mlof phage preparation in PBS/3% BSA was added to an rbc pellet (2×10⁸) asin step 1 in 12 ml tubes (Greiner 187261, Reinach, Switzerland) andincubated at RT for 30 min. with careful shaking. All tubes werepre-blocked in PBS/3% BSA for a minimum of 1 hr at RT. The rbc werepelleted by centrifuging for 5 min. 300×g at 4° C. The resulting phagesupernatant was carefully harvested and the process repeated using rbcas detailed above in steps 2, 3, and 4.

b) Treatment of rbc Rhesus D Negative r′r and ryry and Rhesus DVI+ withBromelase

Bromelase 30 (Baxter, Düdingen, Switzerland) was used to treat rbcRhesus DVI+ in the same proportions as used in a routinehaemagglutination assay, i.e. 10 μl bromelase per 2×10⁶ rbc. Thusbromelase was added to the required amount of rbc and incubated at 37°C. for 30 min. followed by washing 3 times in 0.9% NaCl, re-counting inHayems solution and adjusting to the required concentration in PBS/3%BSA ready for Phab panning.

c) Bio-Panning on Bromelase Treated Rhesus DVI+ rbc

After the final absorption of rbc ryry non bromelase treated the phagesupernatant was divided into 2 equal parts and added either to theenzyme or non enzyme treated rbc group O Rh DVI+ pellet (40×10⁶)respectively and again incubated at RT for 30 min. with gentle shaking.Then the 2 populations of rbc were washed at least 5 times in 10 ml icecold PBS, centrifuged 5 min. 300×g at 4° C., followed by elution with200 μl of 76 mM citric acid pH 2.8 for 6 min. at R.T. and neutralisationwith 200 μl 1M Tris. The rbc were centrifuged 300×g, 5 min. at 4° C. andthe resulting supernatants containing the eluted phages from either thebromelase or non bromelase treated DVI+ rbc were carefully removed andstored with carrier protein (0.3% BSA) at 4° C. ready forre-amplification. In further rounds of panning the eluted phage fromeither the bromelase or non bromelase treated DVI+ rbc were keptseparate and each followed the absorption protocol steps 1 to 4. Theelution step was slightly different compared to panning round 1 as thephage populations were not again divided into 2 parts. Only those phageeluted from bromelase treated DVI+ rbc were also eluted again frombromelase treated DVI+ rbc and only those phage eluted from the nonbromelase treated DVI+ rbc were also again eluted from non bromelasetreated DVI+ rbc. The numbers of specific Phabs after each panning roundare given in table 6. TABLE 6 Selection of Rhesus D Phabs from pooledLD1 and LD2 libraries on Rhesus DVI+ red blood cells No. of elutedRhesus DVI+ specific phages Panning −Bromelase +Bromelase Round No. a)cfu cfu 1 1.9 × 10⁶ 4.4 × 10⁶   2 1.6 × 10⁶ 4 × 10⁵ 3 2.4 × 10⁷ 4.1 ×10⁷   4   3 × 10⁶ 5 × 10⁷ 5   1 × 107⁸ 1 × 10⁸ 6 nd 3 × 10⁸a) For each round 10¹² Phabs were incubated in tubes with 2 differentphenotypes of rbc Group O Rhesus negative (absorption phase) followed byelution from rbc Group O Rhesus DVI+.

EXAMPLE 4 Monitoring of the Panning Rounds and Determination of theSpecificity of the Enriched Phabs Using a Rabbit Anti-Phage Antibody

Indirect Haemagglutination Assay

Freshly collected rbc of different ABO and Rhesus blood groups werewashed 3 times in 0.9% NaCl and adjusted to a 3-5% solution(45-50×10⁷/ml) in either 0.9% NaCl or PBS/3% BSA. For each testcondition 50 μl rbc and 100 μl test (precipitated and amplified phage orcontrol antibodies) were incubated together in glass blood groupingtubes (Baxter, Düdingen, Switzerland) for 30 min. at 37° C. The rbc werewashed 3 times in 0.9% NaCl and then incubated with 2 drops of Coombsreagent (Baxter, Düdingen, Switzerland) for positive controls or with100 μl of 1/1000 diluted rabbit anti-phage antibodies (made byimmunising rabbits with phage VCSM13 preparation, followed bypurification on an Affi-Gel Blue column and absorption on E. coli toremove E. coli-specific antibodies). The tubes were incubated for 20 minat 37° C., centrifuged 1 min at 125×g and rbc examined for agglutinationby careful shaking and using a magnifier viewer.

When purified Fab were tested for agglutination, an affinity purifiedanti-Fab antibody (The Binding Site, Birmingham, U.K.) was used insteadof the rabbit anti-phage antibody.

Table 7 shows the results of haemagglutination tests of Phab samplesafter different panning rounds on R1R1 rbc.

Table 8 shows the results of haemagglutination tests of Phab samplesafter different panning rounds on Rhesus DVI+ rbc.

Table 9 shows the reactivity pattern of individual Fab clones fromlibraries LD1 and LD2 with partial D variants. TABLE 7 Monitoring ofPhabs from LD1 and LD2 libraries by indirect haemagglutination afterpanning on R1R1 rbc Phab sample Library LD1 Library LD2 Panning roundtested on rbc O Rh D+ (a) No. 4 undiluted + + ¼ + +/− 1/20 − − No. 5undiluted ++ + ¼ ++ + 1/20 − − No. 6 undiluted nd +++ ¼ nd ++ 1/20 nd ndHelper phage (b) undiluted, ¼, 1/20 − −(a) Indirect haemagglutination was performed in glass tubes using 50 μlrbc (40 × 10⁷/ml) and 100 μl Phabs starting at 4 × 10¹¹/ml. After 30min. at 37° C. the rbc were washed 3 times and further incubated for 20min. at 37° C. with a 1/1000 dilution of rabbit anti-phage antibody.(b) The M13 helper phage was used as a negative control and showed nononspecific agglutination due to the phage particle alone. Agglutinationwas scored by visual assessment from +++ (strong agglutination)descending to − (no agglutination).nd = not done

TABLE 8 Monitoring of Phabs from pooled LD1 and LD2 libraries byindirect haemagglutination after panning on Rhesus DVI+ rbc Phab samplerbc phenotypes Planning round CCDDee ccddee Ccddee CCddEE DVI (E.J.) DVI(K.S.) Non Bromelase treated rbc DVI+ Round No. 3 a) +++  − +/− (+) +/−+/− Round No. 5 ++ − − − − − Bromelase treated rbc DVI+ Round No. 4 +++− +/− − (+) +/− Round No. 5 +++ − +/− +/− (+++) ++ Round No. 6 ++++ − −− +++ +++ LD1 - 6 - 17 reactive with C and E LD1/2 - 6 - 3 ++++ − − −+/− nd LD1/2 - 6 - 33 ++++ − − − + nda) Agglutination was scored by visual assessment from ++++ (strongagglutination) descending to − (no agglutination).nd = not doneNote:Only those Phabs eluted from bromelase trated DVI+ rbc showed evidenceof agglutination against 2 different DVI+ donors.

TABLE 9 Clonal Analysis of Reactivity of Fab anti-Rhesus D Clones fromLibraries D1 and LD2 against Partial D Variants Partial D Variants (a)Fab Clone No RH33 DIII DIVa DIVb DVa DVI DVII LD1 - 40 − b) +++   + ++/− − ++ - 52 − +++ − − +++ − +++ - 84 − ++ − − − − + - 110 (+) +++++ + + − ++ - 117 − +++ − − − − ++ LD2 - 1 +++ nd +++ +++ + − +++ - 4 −+++ − + − − + - 5 − Nd +++ +++ − − +++ - 10 (−) +++ +++ +++ + − ++ - 11− +++ − − − − ++ - 14 +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ − +++ - 17 − +++ +++ + +/− −+++ - 20 − +++ +++ − +/− − +++ LD1/2-6-33 ++ +++ +++ ++ +++ + ++LD1/2-6-33 +/− +++ +++ +++ +++ + ++(a) soluble Fab preparations were made of each clone followed byindirect haemagglutination.b) Agglutination was scored by visual assessment from +++ (all cellsagglutinated in a clump) descending to − (no cells agglutinated).

EXAMPLE 5 Preparation and Purification of Fab Antibody Fragments forApplication as Diagnostic Reagents

After the bio-panning procedures detailed in Examples 2 and 3 a phagepopulation which showed specific agglutination on Rhesus D+ rbc wasselected and used to prepare phagemid DNA. More precisely the Phabsselected on R1R1 rbc were used after the 5th and 6th rounds ofbio-panning for LD1 and LD2 libraries respectively and after the 5thbio-panning on DVI+ rbc for isolation of the LD1-6-17 clone, in order toproduce soluble Fab, the sequence gIII coding for the pIII tail proteinof the phage particle must be deleted.

Phagemid DNA was prepared using a Nucleotrap kit (Machery-Nagel) and thegIII sequence was removed by digesting the so isolated phagemid DNA withNhe1/Spe1 as described (Burton, D. R., et al., PNAS, 1989). Aftertransformation into XL1-Blue individual clones were selected(nomenclature given in table 1) and grown in LB (Luria Broth) containing50 μg/ml carbenicillin at 37° C. to an OD of 0.6 at 600 nm. Cultureswere induced with 2 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)(Biofinex, Praroman, Switzerland) and grown overnight at 37° C. Thewhole culture was spun at 10,000×g for 30 min. at 4° C. to pellet thebacteria. The bacterial pellet was treated with a lysozyme/DNasesolution to liberate the Fab fragments inside the cells. As some Fabwere released into the culture supernatant this was also harvestedseparately. These Fab preparations were then pooled and precipitatedwith 60% ammonium sulphate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to concentratethe Fab followed by extensive dialysis in phosphate buffered saline(PBS) and ultracentrifugation at 200,000×g to pellet any insolublecomplexes. The Fab preparations were then purified on a ceramichydroxyapatite column (HTP Econo cartridge, BioRad, Glattbrugg,Switzerland) using a gradient elution of PBS (Buffer A) and PBS+0.5MNaCl (Buffer B). The linear gradient was programmed to increase from0-100% Buffer B in 40 min. The Fab was eluted as a single peak between40-60% Buffer B. The positive fractions as identified by immunodot assayusing an anti-Fab peroxidase conjugate (The Binding Site, Birmingham,U.K.) were pooled, concentrated using polyethylene glycol andextensively dialysed against PBS. The positive fractions from thehydroxyapatite column for each clone were used in a classical indirecthaemagglutination assay in glass tubes using either the standard Coombsreagent (Baxter Diagnostics AG Dade, anti-human serum) or an anti-Fab(The Binding Site, Birmingham, U.K.) as the cross linking reagent. TheseFab of defined specificity on the Partial D variants as shown on page 18can be used to type rbc of unknown Partial D phenotype.

EXAMPLE 6 Construction of Complete Immunoglobulin Genes

The LD2-14 heavy chain V gene (V_(H) gene) was amplified from theanti-Rhesus D-Fab-encoding plasmid LD2-14 with the polymerase chainreaction (PCR) using specific primers. The 5′-primer had the sequence:(SEQ ID NO:78) 5′-GGGTCGACGCACAGGTGAAACTGCTCGAGTCTGG-3′

whereas the 3′-primer was of the sequence: (SEQ ID NO:79)5′-GCCGATGTGTAAGGTGACCGTGGTCCCCTTG-3′

The PCR reaction was performed with Deep Vent DNA Polymerase and thebuffer solution (2 mM Mg⁺⁺) from New England Biolabs at the conditionsrecommended by the manufacturer including 100 pmol of each primer andthe four deoxynucleotides at a concentration of 250 μM each. Thereaction was run for 30 cycles with the following temperature steps: 60s at 94° C. (extended by 2 min. during the first cycle), 60 s at 57° C.and 60 s at 72° C. (extended by 10 min. during the last cycle).Post-amplification addition of 3′ A-overhangs was accomplished by asubsequent incubation for 10 min at 72° C. in the presence of 1 unit TaqDNA Polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). The PCR product waspurified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Switzerland)and cloned into the vector pCRII using Invitrogen'S TA cloning kit (SanDiego, USA). Having digested the resulting plasmid TAVH14 with SalI andBstEII, the V_(H) gene was isolated by preparative agarose gelelectrophoresis using Qiagen's QIAquick gel extraction kit.

Vector #150 (Sandoz Pharma, Basel) which contained an irrelevant butintact human genomic immunoglobulin V_(H) gene was cut with SalI andBstEII, and the vector fragment was isolated by preparative agarose gelelectrophoresis using Qiagen's QIAquick gel extraction kit. Ligation ofvector and PCR product was performed at 25° C. for 2 hours in a totalvolume of 20 μl using the rapid DNA Ligation kit (Boehringer Mannheim,Germany). Following ligation, the reaction mix was diluted with 20 μlH₂O and extracted with 10 volumes of n-butanol to remove salts. The DNAwas then pelleted by centrifugation, vacuum dried and resuspended in 10μl H₂O. 5 μl of this DNA solution were electroporated (0.1 cm cuvettes,1.9 kV, 200Ω, 25 μFD) with a GenePulser (BioRad, Gaithersburg) into 40μl of electroporation competent E. coli XL1-blue MRF′ (Stratagene, LaJolla), diluted with SOC medium, incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour andplated on LB plates containing ampicillin (50 μg/ml). Plasmid-minipreps(Qiagen, Basel) of the resulting colonies were checked with restrictiondigests for the presence of the appropriate insert.

With this procedure, the irrelevant resident V_(H) gene in vector #150was replaced by the amplified anti-Rhesus D V_(H) sequence of LD2-14 andyielded plasmid cassVH14. The structure of the resulting immunoglobulinV_(H) gene construct was confirmed by sequencing, cut out by digestionwith EcoRI and BamHI and gel purified as described above. Expressionvector # 10 (Sandoz Pharma, Basel) containing the human genomicimmunoglobulin Cγ1 gene segment was also digested with EcoRI and BamHI,isolated by preparative agarose gel electrophoresis, ligated with theEcoRI/BamHI-V_(H) gene segment previously obtained from plasmid cassVH14and electroporated into E. coli XL1-blue MRF′ as outlined above. Thisresulted in a complete anti-Rhesus D heavy chain immunoglobulin gene inthe expression vector 14IgG1.

The LD2-14 light chain V gene (V_(L) gene) was amplified from the sameanti-Rhesus D-Fab plasmid LD2-14 by PCR using specific primers. The5′-primer had the sequence: (SEQ ID NO:76)5′-TACGCGTTGTGACATCGTGATGACCCAGTCTCCAT-3′

whereas the 3′-primer was of the sequence: (SEQ ID NO:77)5′-AGTCGCTCAGTTCGTTTGATTTCAAGCTTGGTCC-3′

PCR reaction, product purification and subsequent cloning steps wereanalogous to the steps described for the V_(H) gene, except that theappropriate light chain vectors were used. Briefly, the V_(L) PCRproduct was cloned into pCRII vector yielding plasmid TAVL14, excisedtherefrom with MluI and HindIII and isolated by gel extraction. TheV_(L) gene was subsequently cloned into the MluI and HindIII sites ofvector # 151 (Sandoz Pharma, Basel) thus replacing the irrelevantresident V_(L) gene by the amplified anti-Rhesus D V_(L) sequence ofLD2-14. Having confirmed the sequence of the resulting plasmidcassVL-14, the EcoRI/XbaI fragment containing the VL gene was thensubcloned into the restriction sites EcoRI and XbaI of vector # 98(Sandoz Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) which contains the human genomicimmunoglobulin Cκ gene segment. This procedure replaced the irrelevantresident V_(L) gene in plasmid # 98 and yielded the expression vector14kappa which contains the complete anti-Rhesus D light chainimmunoglobulin gene.

The mouse myeloma cell line SP2/0-Ag 14 (ATCC CRL 1581) wascotransfected by electroporation with the expression vectors 14IgG1 and14kappa previously linearized at the unique EcoRI and NotI cleavagesite, respectively. The electroporation was performed as follows:exponentially growing cells were washed twice and suspended in phosphatebuffered sucrose (272 mM sucrose, 1 mM MgCl₂, 7 mM NaH₂PO₄, pH 7.4) at adensity of 2×10⁷ cells/ml. 0.8 ml of cells were added to a 0.4 cmcuvette, mixed with 15 μg of linearized plasmids 14IgG1 and 14kappa,held on ice for 15 min., electroporated with 290 Volts, 200Ω, 25 μFD,put back on ice for 15 min., transferred to a T75 cell culture flaskwith 20 ml of cold RPMI 1640 medium (10% heat inactivated fetal bovineserum, 50 μM beta-mercaptoethanol), left for 2 h at room temperature andthen incubated for 60 h at 37° C. After this period, the cells weretransferred to 50 ml of medium containing 1 mg/ml G418 for selection.Stable transfectants were then selected in the presence of increasingconcentrations of methotrexate to amplify the integrated DNA and thusincreasing the expression of the corresponding antibody rD2-14.

Expression of rD2-14 in the culture's supernatant (SrD2-14) wasmonitored by an enzyme linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA) specific forhuman γ1 and kappa chains. Quantification of the Rhesus D specificimmunoglobulins in the anti-D assay according to Ph. Eur. revealedbetween 1.1 and 11.4 μg/ml of agglutinating antibody in suchsupernatants. They tested agglutination negative for Rhesus negative rbcand revealed the same agglutination potential against partial D variantsas the Fab LD2-14 expressed in E. coli. The data are shown in table 10.TABLE 10 Comparative analysis of reactivity of Fab anti-Rhesus D cloneLD2-14 and antibody rD2-14 against partial D variants Partial D VariantsR1R1 rr Rh33 DIII DIVa DIVb DVa DVI DVII LD2-14 +++ − +++ +++ +++ ++++++ − +++ SrD2-14 +++ − +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ − +++ TCB − −Agglutination was scored by visual assessment from +++ (all cellsagglutinated in a clump) descending to − (no cells agglutinated).LD2-14: Fab fragment prepared as described in Example 5;SrD2-14: cell culture supernatant containing antibody rD2-14;TCB: cell culture supernatant of untransfected cells.

1. A purified polypeptide capable of forming antigen binding structureswith specificity for Rhesus D antigens comprising a V_(H) region havingSEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 6, SEQ ID NO: 10, SEQ ID NO: 14, SEQ ID NO: 18,SEQ ID NO: 22, SEQ ID NO: 26, SEQ ID NO: 30, SEQ ID NO: 34, SEQ ID NO:38, SEQ ID NO: 42, SEQ ID NO: 46, SEQ ID NO: 50, SEQ ID NO: 54, SEQ IDNO: 58 or SEQ ID NO: 62 and a V_(L) region.
 2. The polypeptide of claim1, wherein the polypeptide is an antigen binding Fab fragment.
 3. Thepolypeptide of claim 1, wherein the polypeptide is an immunoglobulinspecific for a Rhesus D antigen.
 4. The polypeptide of claim 3, whereinthe immunoglobulin comprises at least one defined isotype selected fromthe group consisting of IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4.
 5. A recombinantpolynucleotide which encodes the polypeptide of claim
 1. 6. Apharmaceutical composition comprising at least one polypeptide ofclaim
 1. 7. A pharmaceutical composition comprising at least oneimmunoglobulin of claim
 3. 8. A diagnostic composition for Rhesus Dtyping comprising at least one polypeptide of claim
 1. 9. A diagnosticcomposition for Rhesus D typing comprising at least one immunoglobulinof claim
 3. 10. A purified polypeptide capable of forming antigenbinding structures with specificity for Rhesus D antigens comprising aV_(H) region and a V_(L) region having SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 8, SEQID NO: 12, SEQ ID NO: 16, SEQ ID NO: 20, SEQ ID NO: 24, SEQ ID NO: 28,SEQ ID NO: 32, SEQ ID NO: 36, SEQ ID NO: 40, SEQ ID NO: 44, SEQ ID NO:48, SEQ ID NO: 52, SEQ ID NO: 56, SEQ ID NO: 60 or SEQ ID NO:
 64. 11.The polypeptide of claim 10, wherein the polypeptide is an antigenbinding Fab fragment.
 12. The polypeptide of claim 10, wherein thepolypeptide is an immunoglobulin specific for a Rhesus D antigen. 13.The polypeptide of claim 12, wherein the immunoglobulin comprises atleast one defined isotype selected from the group consisting of IgG1,IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4.
 14. A recombinant polynucleotide which encodes thepolypeptide of claim
 10. 15. A pharmaceutical composition comprising atleast one polypeptide of claim
 10. 16. A pharmaceutical compositioncomprising at least one immunoglobulin of claim
 12. 17. A diagnosticcomposition for Rhesus D typing comprising at least one polypeptide ofclaim
 10. 18. A diagnostic composition for Rhesus D typing comprising atleast one immunoglobulin of claim 12.